We’re using word roots to study vocabulary in my Literacy Block class. The goal is for students to be able to understand the meaning of some Latin/Greek word roots to help them identify other words they come across while reading. I also want them to be able to use new vocabulary words (that use these roots) in context.
So, we’ve worked on three roots so far: chron-, dict-, and ambi-. For each root, students have gotten five new vocabulary words, which I pick base on how frequently I think students will encounter them in their lives.
I’ve noticed that the students usually understand the general meaning of each word, especially when we talk through how the root fits in.
However, after their first quiz, I found that the trouble comes with correctly using the word in context. For instance, their quiz asked them to read ten sentences and determine if the vocabulary word in each sentence was being used correctly. I reminded them that the word might be incorrect based on meaning or based on the form of the word. One of the sentences on the quiz was as follows:
“The district attorney should really indictment the man who they suspect stole millions of dollars from the company.”
This question was one of the most commonly missed on the quiz--many of them said the sentence was correct. Students understood that an “indictment” had to do with committing a crime; however, they were still struggling with using the actual word (or forms of the word) authentically.
So what to do, what to do? How can Google Apps help me with providing the students with authentic experiences with reading/applying these words, ideally while differentiating for each learner?
I found an answer in Google Slides. To review for the quiz retake, students could “investigate” each word in different ways, using YouTube clips, news articles, and images. I also tried to find ways for kids to practice actually using some of the words in sentences.
I created this Google Slides presentation and made copies for each student on Classroom. I asked students to investigate only the words they missed on the quiz.
Here, students are first practicing with exploring examples of the word. But they also get to practice actually using the word itself in their writing.
On the quiz, students really struggled to understand that we typically use the word “chronic” to describe a problem or negative condition. Some of these boxes led to discussion about whether describing them as “chronic” would be appropriate: a great conversation for students to engage in!
So in theory, I was pumped about this activity--lots of differentiation, multiple means for students to be engaged, and purposefully designed to reteach/practice skills students struggled with. In practice, although the students did not share my high level of excitement (still getting there!), they definitely bought in. I was able to review their work later that day to address questions I had for particular students the next day, asking them to clarify their thinking.
The downside here? This slideshow definitely took a decent chunk of time to put together. Granted, the planning was pretty fun--thinking about video clips to use and creative ways to get kids to see the words in context. But...shouldn’t students be doing that part of the thinking? In the future, I’d like to try asking students to put together an “investigation” slideshow like this. They have a model now with this first one, but I think asking students to create their own investigation practice, trying to find the words in authentic contexts, would really increase the rigor in technology implementation.